Review





Similar Products

96
Proteintech polyclonal antibody proteintech 10201 2 ap anti human p
Polyclonal Antibody Proteintech 10201 2 Ap Anti Human P, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/polyclonal antibody proteintech 10201 2 ap anti human p/product/Proteintech
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
polyclonal antibody proteintech 10201 2 ap anti human p - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher rabbit anti-p-y420-src (psfk) antibody coupled to af488
( A ) TIME mEmerald-CD36 cells were processed for PLA between CD36 and each one of the candidate proteins. PLA dots quantification was performed in Cell Profiler ( ; ) and based on the numeration of the PLA dots within the cells’ area, segmented using the <t>concavalinA-AF488</t> labeling. Representative images of PLA dots in positive (mEm-CD36 labeled with mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP) and negative (mEm-CD36 and mitofilin labeled with rabbit anti-GFP and mouse anti-mifofilin) control conditions are shown together with the resulting segmented images (right panels). Scale bar: 100µm. ( B ) Quantification of the density of PLA dots between CD36 and candidate proteins. Boxplots display the PLA dot density per cell normalized to the positive control (mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP). The number of cells analyzed for each candidate protein is denoted below each boxplot. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to determine if there were statistically significant differences between groups. Dunn’s post-hoc test was used to determine pairwise significance values and are shown above the corresponding boxplots. Non-significant (ns) values are for α value > 0.05.
Rabbit Anti P Y420 Src (Psfk) Antibody Coupled To Af488, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti-p-y420-src (psfk) antibody coupled to af488/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti-p-y420-src (psfk) antibody coupled to af488 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti p src y416 wb cell signaling tech
( A ) TIME mEmerald-CD36 cells were processed for PLA between CD36 and each one of the candidate proteins. PLA dots quantification was performed in Cell Profiler ( ; ) and based on the numeration of the PLA dots within the cells’ area, segmented using the <t>concavalinA-AF488</t> labeling. Representative images of PLA dots in positive (mEm-CD36 labeled with mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP) and negative (mEm-CD36 and mitofilin labeled with rabbit anti-GFP and mouse anti-mifofilin) control conditions are shown together with the resulting segmented images (right panels). Scale bar: 100µm. ( B ) Quantification of the density of PLA dots between CD36 and candidate proteins. Boxplots display the PLA dot density per cell normalized to the positive control (mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP). The number of cells analyzed for each candidate protein is denoted below each boxplot. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to determine if there were statistically significant differences between groups. Dunn’s post-hoc test was used to determine pairwise significance values and are shown above the corresponding boxplots. Non-significant (ns) values are for α value > 0.05.
Anti P Src Y416 Wb Cell Signaling Tech, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti p src y416 wb cell signaling tech/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti p src y416 wb cell signaling tech - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Proteintech 11282 sab β3 wb 18309 ap 1 proteintech p src
( A ) TIME mEmerald-CD36 cells were processed for PLA between CD36 and each one of the candidate proteins. PLA dots quantification was performed in Cell Profiler ( ; ) and based on the numeration of the PLA dots within the cells’ area, segmented using the <t>concavalinA-AF488</t> labeling. Representative images of PLA dots in positive (mEm-CD36 labeled with mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP) and negative (mEm-CD36 and mitofilin labeled with rabbit anti-GFP and mouse anti-mifofilin) control conditions are shown together with the resulting segmented images (right panels). Scale bar: 100µm. ( B ) Quantification of the density of PLA dots between CD36 and candidate proteins. Boxplots display the PLA dot density per cell normalized to the positive control (mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP). The number of cells analyzed for each candidate protein is denoted below each boxplot. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to determine if there were statistically significant differences between groups. Dunn’s post-hoc test was used to determine pairwise significance values and are shown above the corresponding boxplots. Non-significant (ns) values are for α value > 0.05.
11282 Sab β3 Wb 18309 Ap 1 Proteintech P Src, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/11282 sab β3 wb 18309 ap 1 proteintech p src/product/Proteintech
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
11282 sab β3 wb 18309 ap 1 proteintech p src - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit-anti-p-src (y416)
( A ) TIME mEmerald-CD36 cells were processed for PLA between CD36 and each one of the candidate proteins. PLA dots quantification was performed in Cell Profiler ( ; ) and based on the numeration of the PLA dots within the cells’ area, segmented using the <t>concavalinA-AF488</t> labeling. Representative images of PLA dots in positive (mEm-CD36 labeled with mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP) and negative (mEm-CD36 and mitofilin labeled with rabbit anti-GFP and mouse anti-mifofilin) control conditions are shown together with the resulting segmented images (right panels). Scale bar: 100µm. ( B ) Quantification of the density of PLA dots between CD36 and candidate proteins. Boxplots display the PLA dot density per cell normalized to the positive control (mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP). The number of cells analyzed for each candidate protein is denoted below each boxplot. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to determine if there were statistically significant differences between groups. Dunn’s post-hoc test was used to determine pairwise significance values and are shown above the corresponding boxplots. Non-significant (ns) values are for α value > 0.05.
Rabbit Anti P Src (Y416), supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit-anti-p-src (y416)/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit-anti-p-src (y416) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Cell Signaling Technology Inc p src
( A ) TIME mEmerald-CD36 cells were processed for PLA between CD36 and each one of the candidate proteins. PLA dots quantification was performed in Cell Profiler ( ; ) and based on the numeration of the PLA dots within the cells’ area, segmented using the <t>concavalinA-AF488</t> labeling. Representative images of PLA dots in positive (mEm-CD36 labeled with mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP) and negative (mEm-CD36 and mitofilin labeled with rabbit anti-GFP and mouse anti-mifofilin) control conditions are shown together with the resulting segmented images (right panels). Scale bar: 100µm. ( B ) Quantification of the density of PLA dots between CD36 and candidate proteins. Boxplots display the PLA dot density per cell normalized to the positive control (mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP). The number of cells analyzed for each candidate protein is denoted below each boxplot. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to determine if there were statistically significant differences between groups. Dunn’s post-hoc test was used to determine pairwise significance values and are shown above the corresponding boxplots. Non-significant (ns) values are for α value > 0.05.
P Src, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/p src/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p src - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Cell Signaling Technology Inc p-src antibody
( A ) TIME mEmerald-CD36 cells were processed for PLA between CD36 and each one of the candidate proteins. PLA dots quantification was performed in Cell Profiler ( ; ) and based on the numeration of the PLA dots within the cells’ area, segmented using the <t>concavalinA-AF488</t> labeling. Representative images of PLA dots in positive (mEm-CD36 labeled with mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP) and negative (mEm-CD36 and mitofilin labeled with rabbit anti-GFP and mouse anti-mifofilin) control conditions are shown together with the resulting segmented images (right panels). Scale bar: 100µm. ( B ) Quantification of the density of PLA dots between CD36 and candidate proteins. Boxplots display the PLA dot density per cell normalized to the positive control (mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP). The number of cells analyzed for each candidate protein is denoted below each boxplot. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to determine if there were statistically significant differences between groups. Dunn’s post-hoc test was used to determine pairwise significance values and are shown above the corresponding boxplots. Non-significant (ns) values are for α value > 0.05.
P Src Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/p-src antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p-src antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Cell Signaling Technology Inc p src y416
( A ) TIME mEmerald-CD36 cells were processed for PLA between CD36 and each one of the candidate proteins. PLA dots quantification was performed in Cell Profiler ( ; ) and based on the numeration of the PLA dots within the cells’ area, segmented using the <t>concavalinA-AF488</t> labeling. Representative images of PLA dots in positive (mEm-CD36 labeled with mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP) and negative (mEm-CD36 and mitofilin labeled with rabbit anti-GFP and mouse anti-mifofilin) control conditions are shown together with the resulting segmented images (right panels). Scale bar: 100µm. ( B ) Quantification of the density of PLA dots between CD36 and candidate proteins. Boxplots display the PLA dot density per cell normalized to the positive control (mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP). The number of cells analyzed for each candidate protein is denoted below each boxplot. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to determine if there were statistically significant differences between groups. Dunn’s post-hoc test was used to determine pairwise significance values and are shown above the corresponding boxplots. Non-significant (ns) values are for α value > 0.05.
P Src Y416, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/p src y416/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p src y416 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Cell Signaling Technology Inc antibodies to phosphorylated src (p-src)
( A ) TIME mEmerald-CD36 cells were processed for PLA between CD36 and each one of the candidate proteins. PLA dots quantification was performed in Cell Profiler ( ; ) and based on the numeration of the PLA dots within the cells’ area, segmented using the <t>concavalinA-AF488</t> labeling. Representative images of PLA dots in positive (mEm-CD36 labeled with mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP) and negative (mEm-CD36 and mitofilin labeled with rabbit anti-GFP and mouse anti-mifofilin) control conditions are shown together with the resulting segmented images (right panels). Scale bar: 100µm. ( B ) Quantification of the density of PLA dots between CD36 and candidate proteins. Boxplots display the PLA dot density per cell normalized to the positive control (mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP). The number of cells analyzed for each candidate protein is denoted below each boxplot. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to determine if there were statistically significant differences between groups. Dunn’s post-hoc test was used to determine pairwise significance values and are shown above the corresponding boxplots. Non-significant (ns) values are for α value > 0.05.
Antibodies To Phosphorylated Src (P Src), supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies to phosphorylated src (p-src)/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies to phosphorylated src (p-src) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc p src y 527 rabbit polyclonal 2105 cell signaling technology
( A ) TIME mEmerald-CD36 cells were processed for PLA between CD36 and each one of the candidate proteins. PLA dots quantification was performed in Cell Profiler ( ; ) and based on the numeration of the PLA dots within the cells’ area, segmented using the <t>concavalinA-AF488</t> labeling. Representative images of PLA dots in positive (mEm-CD36 labeled with mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP) and negative (mEm-CD36 and mitofilin labeled with rabbit anti-GFP and mouse anti-mifofilin) control conditions are shown together with the resulting segmented images (right panels). Scale bar: 100µm. ( B ) Quantification of the density of PLA dots between CD36 and candidate proteins. Boxplots display the PLA dot density per cell normalized to the positive control (mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP). The number of cells analyzed for each candidate protein is denoted below each boxplot. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to determine if there were statistically significant differences between groups. Dunn’s post-hoc test was used to determine pairwise significance values and are shown above the corresponding boxplots. Non-significant (ns) values are for α value > 0.05.
P Src Y 527 Rabbit Polyclonal 2105 Cell Signaling Technology, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/p src y 527 rabbit polyclonal 2105 cell signaling technology/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
p src y 527 rabbit polyclonal 2105 cell signaling technology - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


( A ) TIME mEmerald-CD36 cells were processed for PLA between CD36 and each one of the candidate proteins. PLA dots quantification was performed in Cell Profiler ( ; ) and based on the numeration of the PLA dots within the cells’ area, segmented using the concavalinA-AF488 labeling. Representative images of PLA dots in positive (mEm-CD36 labeled with mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP) and negative (mEm-CD36 and mitofilin labeled with rabbit anti-GFP and mouse anti-mifofilin) control conditions are shown together with the resulting segmented images (right panels). Scale bar: 100µm. ( B ) Quantification of the density of PLA dots between CD36 and candidate proteins. Boxplots display the PLA dot density per cell normalized to the positive control (mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP). The number of cells analyzed for each candidate protein is denoted below each boxplot. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to determine if there were statistically significant differences between groups. Dunn’s post-hoc test was used to determine pairwise significance values and are shown above the corresponding boxplots. Non-significant (ns) values are for α value > 0.05.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Investigation of CD36 interactome provides insights into multimolecular complexes necessary for anti-angiogenic signalling

doi: 10.1101/2025.07.15.664851

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) TIME mEmerald-CD36 cells were processed for PLA between CD36 and each one of the candidate proteins. PLA dots quantification was performed in Cell Profiler ( ; ) and based on the numeration of the PLA dots within the cells’ area, segmented using the concavalinA-AF488 labeling. Representative images of PLA dots in positive (mEm-CD36 labeled with mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP) and negative (mEm-CD36 and mitofilin labeled with rabbit anti-GFP and mouse anti-mifofilin) control conditions are shown together with the resulting segmented images (right panels). Scale bar: 100µm. ( B ) Quantification of the density of PLA dots between CD36 and candidate proteins. Boxplots display the PLA dot density per cell normalized to the positive control (mouse anti-CD36 and rabbit anti-GFP). The number of cells analyzed for each candidate protein is denoted below each boxplot. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to determine if there were statistically significant differences between groups. Dunn’s post-hoc test was used to determine pairwise significance values and are shown above the corresponding boxplots. Non-significant (ns) values are for α value > 0.05.

Article Snippet: For immunostaining, cells were permeabilized and block simultaneously (PBS with 0.1% TX-100 and 3% BSA) for 30 min at room temperature, before being incubated with rabbit anti-P-Y420-Src (pSFK) antibody coupled to AF488 (ThermoFisher, 44-660A1) and phalloidin-AF568 (ThermoFisher, ref: A12380).

Techniques: Labeling, Control, Positive Control

( A ) Levels of active Fyn determined by immunostaining of pSFK in cells stimulated or not with anti-CD36 IgM antibodies. TIME HT-CD36 cells expressing no shRNAs or scrambled, CD9 or ITGB1 shRNAs were stimulated (+) or not (-) with mouse anti-CD36 IgM (10 µg/mL) for 15 min. Cells were fixed, immunostained for pSFK and imaged by TIRF microscopy using identical parameters for all conditions. The levels of pSFK were determined using Cell Profiler by measurement of the mean intensity of pSFK for each cell. Cell segmentation was done using F-actin labeling. The boxplots indicate the median intensity of pSFK per cell and statistical comparisons were done using non-parametric T-test between stimulated and unstimulated conditions. Results are from 3 experiments and a minimum of 64 cells analyzed per condition. ( B ) Summary of conditional colocalization measurements indicating the effect CD9 on the colocalization between CD36 and pSFK. TIME HT-CD36 cells were stimulated (bottom panel) or not (top panel) with anti-CD36 IgM for 15 min, and immunostained for conditional colocalization with HT-JF549X, anti-pSFK-AF488 and anti-CD9 AF647. Statistical analysis as for F. A minimum of 75 cells per conditions were imaged across 3 experiments. ( C ) Summary of conditional colocalization measurements indicating the effect of active ITGB1 on the colocalization between CD36 and pSFK as in (B). TIME HT-CD36 cells were stimulated (bottom panel) or not (top panel) with anti-CD36 IgM for 15 min, and immunostained for conditional colocalization with HT-JF549X, anti-pSFK-AF488 and anti-active ITGB1 AF647. At least 53 cells per condition were imaged across 3 experiments. Comparisons shown as in (C). ( D-E ) Effect of silencing ITGB1 ( D ) or CD9 ( E ) on CD36 and pSFK conditional colocalization measurements highlighted in panel B (blue) and C (brown). TIME HT-CD36 cells expressing indicated shRNA and stimulated or not with IgM anti-CD36 were processed for conditional colocalization between CD36, pSFK and either CD9 (D) or ITGB1 (E). A non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post-hoc test were used to determine statistical differences between stimulated and unstimulated conditional colocalization experiments. Data are from 3 experiments and a minimum of 50 cells analysed.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Investigation of CD36 interactome provides insights into multimolecular complexes necessary for anti-angiogenic signalling

doi: 10.1101/2025.07.15.664851

Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Levels of active Fyn determined by immunostaining of pSFK in cells stimulated or not with anti-CD36 IgM antibodies. TIME HT-CD36 cells expressing no shRNAs or scrambled, CD9 or ITGB1 shRNAs were stimulated (+) or not (-) with mouse anti-CD36 IgM (10 µg/mL) for 15 min. Cells were fixed, immunostained for pSFK and imaged by TIRF microscopy using identical parameters for all conditions. The levels of pSFK were determined using Cell Profiler by measurement of the mean intensity of pSFK for each cell. Cell segmentation was done using F-actin labeling. The boxplots indicate the median intensity of pSFK per cell and statistical comparisons were done using non-parametric T-test between stimulated and unstimulated conditions. Results are from 3 experiments and a minimum of 64 cells analyzed per condition. ( B ) Summary of conditional colocalization measurements indicating the effect CD9 on the colocalization between CD36 and pSFK. TIME HT-CD36 cells were stimulated (bottom panel) or not (top panel) with anti-CD36 IgM for 15 min, and immunostained for conditional colocalization with HT-JF549X, anti-pSFK-AF488 and anti-CD9 AF647. Statistical analysis as for F. A minimum of 75 cells per conditions were imaged across 3 experiments. ( C ) Summary of conditional colocalization measurements indicating the effect of active ITGB1 on the colocalization between CD36 and pSFK as in (B). TIME HT-CD36 cells were stimulated (bottom panel) or not (top panel) with anti-CD36 IgM for 15 min, and immunostained for conditional colocalization with HT-JF549X, anti-pSFK-AF488 and anti-active ITGB1 AF647. At least 53 cells per condition were imaged across 3 experiments. Comparisons shown as in (C). ( D-E ) Effect of silencing ITGB1 ( D ) or CD9 ( E ) on CD36 and pSFK conditional colocalization measurements highlighted in panel B (blue) and C (brown). TIME HT-CD36 cells expressing indicated shRNA and stimulated or not with IgM anti-CD36 were processed for conditional colocalization between CD36, pSFK and either CD9 (D) or ITGB1 (E). A non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s post-hoc test were used to determine statistical differences between stimulated and unstimulated conditional colocalization experiments. Data are from 3 experiments and a minimum of 50 cells analysed.

Article Snippet: For immunostaining, cells were permeabilized and block simultaneously (PBS with 0.1% TX-100 and 3% BSA) for 30 min at room temperature, before being incubated with rabbit anti-P-Y420-Src (pSFK) antibody coupled to AF488 (ThermoFisher, 44-660A1) and phalloidin-AF568 (ThermoFisher, ref: A12380).

Techniques: Immunostaining, Expressing, Microscopy, Labeling, shRNA